The recent decision that the US small business administration (SBA) decided to withdraw its independence 8 (A) contract authorities of USAID has a big impact on small business owners involved in federal contracts. This move follows a $ 550 million bribery scandal in a program designed to support social and economically disadvantaged business.
SBA’s actions come from the survey conducted by the US Department of Justice, which found a profound corruption within USAID. Kelly Loeffler, a SBA administrator, said, “According to the Trump administration, the SBA will not tolerate the abuse of the government contract process, which is the ability of an institution that can independently handle the contract, which is a program that allows USAID to mandate $ 3.6 billion in contracts through the SBA’s 8 (A) business development program last year. The goal is to strengthen the integrity of the federal contract environment by eliminating it.
8 (a) Business development programs are designed to allow small companies to access federal contracts through simplified processes. In a normal situation, the federal agency can bypass the competitive bidding process and award the single source contract to eight certified businesses. However, according to the LOEFFLER, the recent revelation has recently stopped the USAID’s independent contract authorities because of the recent revelation.
One amazing case was associated with the 8 (A) contractor, which was confirmed to be «honesty or integrity,» but the company received an additional $ 800 million federal contract to analyze Central America’s «fundamental cause of irregular migration.» This case raises important concerns about supervision and contracts, especially small businesses in the federal market, which finds legitimate opportunities.
In response to this scandal, the SBA does not limit the USAID’s contract ability. In addition, we are starting a comprehensive audit of the 8 (A) program, which will survey high value added and restricted contracts awarded over the past 15 years. The results of this audit will be sent to the SBA’s prosecutor and the Ministry of Justice for further measures. This thorough test aims to recover misuse and ensure the fairness of a program that many small businesses depend on.
8 (a) Small business owners who are considering participation in the program can have an immediate and long -term impact on this decision. On the other hand, the expected increase of the director can lead to a more fair contract environment. On the other hand, while the reforms are enforced, the contracted slowdown in contract can affect the future plan for businesses that depend on cash flow and government contracts.
As SBA managers take action to restore the trust and transparency of federal contracts, small business owners must be ready to explore the changing environment. 8 (a) opportunities related to the contract can be strongly maintained, but the access path may be different.
It is essential to maintain information for small business owners who can be overwhelmed by the meaning of this change. Investing time to understand the new director’s mechanism can help you with a better location to take advantage of the upcoming opportunity. When the SBA continues to improve the process, it focuses on allowing small businesses to thrive in competitive federal contracts.
The potential of the more powerful and responsible 8 (a) program provides hope that it can restore the integrity of the federal contract. However, the owner of small businesses must raise the potential task as the SBA is moving the gear in response to the amazing scandal. For more information, read the SBA’s full presentation. here.
Image through ENVATO
